Equilateral Triangles Collaboration is an excellent conference icebreaker that highlights how large self-organizing groups can successfully collaborate without the need for stringent rules, regulations and leadership.


Download free slides... enter your email address at the bottom to get this team building activity in your inbox

Download free slides... enter your email address at the bottom to get this team building activity in your inbox
Objective
When Would You Use It?
Are There Any Rules?
Resources Required
Roles & Responsibilities
Facilitator | Participants |
---|---|

Picture of me running this activity live
Process
- 1The Facilitator introduces the icebreaker as a short workshop where we’ll quickly see how collaborative we can be in a relatively short amount of time.
- 2The Facilitator asks the Participants to spread themselves out randomly around the room.
- 3The Facilitator then asks the Participants to, without talking, pick two other people in the room and keep them in their heads.
- 4The Facilitator then explains that the goal for each person is to now form an equilateral triangle between themselves and the two people they have chosen – no other rules apply other than not being able to talk (i.e. the Participants can put their arms out and point at the two people they’re trying to triangulate on).
- 5The Facilitator then says go and starts the stopwatch.
- 6Once the room has stopped moving the Facilitator stops the stopwatch and announces to the room how long the task took (normally about 1 minute).
- 7The Facilitator then leads a discussion using questions like:
I like it! Facilitating workshops on Collaboration , I will use it.
Thank you for sharing!
I’m also using it this Thursday Celeste so I’ll let you know how it goes.
Thanks!
Thanks for saying thanks Jean 🙂
this is a fun icebreaker. May try incorporating it with Walk Abouts – where the participants mill around the room and the facilitator calls our various situations/styles/ways to greet each other.
Nice idea Faris. Let us know how it goes.
There’s another variation on this theme… Get them to complete the triangle exercise and lead the discussion whilst everyone remains standing in their place. Then take just one or two people and ask them to move. Tell the rest of the group that the game is still running and they should respond if their triangle gets out of shape.
You suddenly find a lot, if not all, of the room is moving again – all because of the actions of one or two people.
This speaks to the often hidden complexities of teams in large organisations.
Reflect on how your movements might affect others across the organisation.
That is a brilliant build Roger. I love the extra message. And then you have another plenary discussion once the room has stopped moving again?
Exactly!
Have used this exercise to illustrate how systems work, that if one element in the system changes (in this case, one person moves), then the other elements will react to it.
Good to process if people were being mindful of the people following them or using them as their reference point.
Hallo
I have recently tried a variation on this. I posted it on two blog posts under http://aliterconcept.com/blogue/interactions-magiques-dans-lorganisation-intelligente/ and the end two days later.
In French. but Google translate is getting better my the minute….
Hi there, I like the sound of this! But can someone clarify… I’m trying to picture running this exercise. Without talking, does the group eventually clue in and form one large equilateral triangle, after trying to form a number of small 3 person ones? Thanks Kim
Hi Kim … thanks for your question … just in case you didn’t get a notification Harold has answered your question below 🙂
The exercise ends when all 3-person groups have created their triangles. Creating one triangle would be possible if they clumped into three groups, but I have never seen it happen.
It will work in my safe home with participants of the program.
Hi Nick
These icebreakers look great, quick, slick interactive and above all clean and simple to facilitate. Regards, Vaughan
I’ve used this exercise with over 50 people in a room with many obstacles like tables, columns, chairs. After explaining the simple rules, I asked them how long they thought it would take to self-organize into the triangles. Answers ranged from 10 – 20 minutes. Actual time? Just over 2 minutes. Very powerful!
Great idea to get their predictions first Julee!
Hi all,
this seems a really nice exercise. I like also Roger’s additional suggestion of changing one or two nodes of the final shape
I’m a little anxious that the team always succeeds ? If all members chose two “triangle partners” freely, I can see many cases without a solution.. at least on a plane. Perhaps I’m too mathematical, or am I missing something in the rules ?
Thanks for sharing all these nice activities
Try it and give it a go. It’s amazing how it works out for the vast majority of the people in the room.
This activity was applied to us in a training session. We were nearly 20 people (or 1-2 people more). And we couldn’t reach a solution since everyone kept moving endlessly while the other vertices were also re-positioning themselves. Our facilitator announced that there is a possible solution (though I didn’t believe it, at that time.) Instead of focusing on the solution, she created a discussion on our reactions, our communication style and the need to control others. It was a good discussion. Another good point could have been thinking on what will happen if our actions only depend on others’. So, if a group is not successful in finding a solution, that’s no problem. There is always enough finding to talk about.
I wonder if there is a way to do something similar with smaller groups. My company team has 5 people in it, and would really like to use this activity. Any thoughts? Also, to spice things up, it’s a remote team. Would welcome any suggestions.
Hmm not sure whether this is the right activity for your group Agustina. You really need more people to make this an eye-opener for them. It would be pretty easy for 5 people to form the triangles between them.
I am wondering if this, or some variation, might be useful to explain the need for networking, going outside of one’s usual network to integrate and collaborate in order to find the ‘best’ people to work on a new project.
Great ideas I got that’s going to be used in my organization
Thanks